Cyberknife Vs Proton Beam Therapy

Patients seeking an advanced treatment option for their prostate cancer may compare cyberknife and proton therapy.

Cyberknife vs proton beam therapy.

A beam of radiation is directed into the body. There is one marked difference between proton beam radiation and cyberknife. While both are known for their precision and minimal side effects each targets the tumor differently. Under cyberknife therapy the patient is given 5 to 20 gy per fraction whereas under proton therapy this amount is just 1 8 2 0 gy per fraction.

Men with prostate cancer are understandably concerned over which treatment modality will be most effective. When seeking advanced treatment options for prostate cancer patients may find themselves comparing cyberknife and proton therapy. Both cyberknife and proton are forms of radiation however cyberknife has many advantages over proton beam radiation as a prostate cancer treatment. Cyberknife is the most advanced treatment available using image guided robotics to destroy prostate cancer while preserving the surrounding tissue.

This may also be called x ray therapy 3d conformal radiation intensity modulated radiation therapy imrt cobalt photon or proton therapy. Cyberknife versus proton therapy. While comparing proton therapy vs cyberknife therapy it is important to note that cyberknife therapy lasts just for 3 5 days. Proton therapy versus imrt and cyberknife.

This is called brachytherapy. According to over 30 years of clinical studies the theoretical advantages of proton therapy have not proven to be significantly better than other radiation treatment technologies such as imrt and cyberknife. Proton therapy is a type of particle therapy in which high energy proton beams are delivered to tumors by a cyclotron. While both are known for their precision and minimal side effects each targets the tumor differently.

Both protons and cyberknife involve precision delivery of radiation therapy says sean cavanaugh md chief of radiation oncology cancer treatment centers.